General
Julius Marton, by Michael Marton, as Attorney-in-Fact, Respondent, v. William H. Davis, Appellant
8 A.D.3d 1042778 N.Y.S.2d 334·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2004·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Julius Marton, by Michael Marton, as Attorney-in-Fact, Respondent, v William H. Davis, Appellant.
[778 NYS2d 334]
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Steuben County (Peter C. Bradstreet, A.J.), entered January 15, 2003. The order denied defendant-petitioner’s application for a permanent injunction and to hold plaintiff-respondent in contempt and denied without prejudice plaintiff-respondent’s motion for leave to reargue and reopen a prior proceeding.
It is hereby ordered that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue be and the same hereby is unanimously dismissed (see Empire Ins. Co. v Food City, 167 AD2d 983, 984 [1990]) and the order is affirmed without costs. Present—Hurlbutt, J.P., Scudder, Gorski, Martoche and Hayes, JJ.