General
The Poughkeepsie Savings Bank, Respondent, v. George Cohen and Others, Defendants, and Wener Holding Co., Inc., Appellant
229 A.D. 789·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1930·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Poughkeepsie Savings Bank, Respondent, v. George Cohen and Others, Defendants, and Wener Holding Co., Inc., Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Order denying appellant’s application to vacate that part of the judgment, dated September 7,1929, which awards an additional allowance of $961.75 to the plaintiff, reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, in so far as it denies such application, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. The additional allowance was improper and the application to vacate or set aside “ the erroneous and illegal part of the judgment was legal and regular.” (Herpe v. Herpe, 225 N. Y. 323.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper, Hagarty and Scudder, JJ., concur.