Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Isadore Neuman, Respondent, v. The New York Mutual Savings and Loan Association, Appellant, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 606 · caselaw · US
General
Isadore Neuman, Respondent, v. The New York Mutual Savings and Loan Association, Appellant
162 N.Y. 606·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Isadore Neuman, Respondent, v. The New York Mutual Savings and Loan Association, Appellant.
Reported, below, 17 App. Div. 72.
(Argued February 26, 1900;
decided March 6, 1900.)
Motion to open default taken by reason of the non-appearance of counsel of appellant upon the call of the case and to reinstate an appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme "Court in the fourth judicial department, entered April 16, 1897, reversing a judgment in favor of defendant entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court on trial at Special Term, and granting a new trial.
Thomas F. Conway for motion.
T. Harvey Ferris opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion to open default granted, on payment of ten dollars costs. -