General
Louis L. Bassett et al., Respondents, v. Bando Sangsa Company, Ltd., et al., Appellants
97 A.D.2d 710·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1983·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Louis L. Bassett et al., Respondents, v Bando Sangsa Company, Ltd., et al., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ira Gammerman, J.), entered on April 8,1983, affirmed. Respondents shall recover of appellants $75 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Concur — Kupferman, J. P., Sullivan, Bloom and Alexander, JJ.
[DISSENT — Silverman, J.]
Silverman, J.
dissents in part in a memorandum as follows: I would modify the order appealed from so as to deny plaintiff’s motion to strike the defense of lack of jurisdiction of the person as to defendant Bando Sangsa Company, Ltd., except as to the sixth cause of action, as to which said defendant concedes the propriety of the order. This complaint and this record are so confusing and yet skimpy that I think it is safer not to make any final rulings of law, either as to the sufficiency of the complaint or jurisdiction, until the facts are more fully explored.