Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
C. I. T. CORPORATION, Joseph B. Whitman, and Winternitz-Tauber Co. v. UNION GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY, as Receiver of CHAS. H. WERNER & SONS COMPANY, Bankrupt, 1932 — 61 F.2d 1022 · caselaw · US
Corporations
C. I. T. CORPORATION, Joseph B. Whitman, and Winternitz-Tauber Co. v. UNION GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY, as Receiver of CHAS. H. WERNER & SONS COMPANY, Bankrupt
61 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
C. I. T. CORPORATION, Joseph B. Whitman, and Winternitz-Tauber Co. v. UNION GUARDIAN TRUST COMPANY, as Receiver of CHAS. H. WERNER & SONS COMPANY, Bankrupt.
No. 6271.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 4, 1932.
Max Kahn and Leonard V. Pylkas, both of Detroit, Mich., for appellants.
Louis G. Friedman, of Detroit, Mich., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Dismissed pursuant to stipulation of counsel.