Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
KILLIAN, Administrator, v. CLARK, 1884 — 111 U.S. 784 · caselaw · US
General
KILLIAN, Administrator, v. CLARK
111 U.S. 78428 L. Ed. 599·Supreme Court of the United States·1884
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
KILLIAN, Administrator, v. CLARK.
APPEAL PROM THE.SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA.
Submitted April 17th, 1884.
Decided May 5th, 1884.
Appeal
Grigsby v. Purcell, 99 U. S. 595, that"“-an appeal will be dismissed, when, at , the term to which it was returnable, the transcript was, by reason of the laches of the appellant,1 not filed, or the eause docketed in this court .” cited and affirmed.
Mr. William J. Miller for appellants.
Mr. Francis Miller for appellee.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Waite]
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
This appeal is dismissed. The decree appealed from.was entered on the 20th of May, 1878, ahd. an appeal afiowed these appellants in open court on the- 22d of May; No bond for thé appeal was given until the 7th of October,, 1881, the day on which the cause was for the first time-docketed here. The appeal of May 22d, 18.78, became inoperative by reason of the failure to give the necessary bond and docket the case here during, the October term, 1878, Grigsby v. Purcell, 99 U. S. 505, and the acceptance of the bond in October, 1881, cannot have the effect of an allowance of a new appeal, because it was more than two years after the decree had been entered.
:Dismissed.-