Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Whitcomb, Governor of Indiana, et al. v. Communist Party of Indiana et al., 1972 — 409 U.S. 806 · caselaw · US
General
Whitcomb, Governor of Indiana, et al. v. Communist Party of Indiana et al.
409 U.S. 806·Supreme Court of the United States·1972
Mr. Justice Douglas would treat motion of Communist Party of Indiana et al. as jurisdictional statement and postpone question of jurisdiction to hearing of case on the merits.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. A-370.
Whitcomb, Governor of Indiana, et al. v. Communist Party of Indiana et al.
[MAJORITY]
D. C. N. D. Ind. Motion of applicants for emergency stay presented to Mr. Justice Rehnquist, and by him referred to the Court, denied as moot. Cross motion of Communist Party of Indiana et al. to petition for mandate to enforce prior order of United States District Court also denied.
Mr. Justice Douglas would treat motion of Communist Party of Indiana et al. as jurisdictional statement and postpone question of jurisdiction to hearing of case on the merits.