General
In the Matter of the Application of William J. Dawley, Petitioner, Respondent, for an Order Pursuant to Section 475 of the Judiciary Law to Fix an Attorney's Lien. Benjamin F. Haas, Appellant, v. Albert Goldstein and Nat Rosenthal, Defendants. (Action No. 1.); Benjamin F. Haas, Appellant, v. Albert Goldstein, Defendant. (Action No. 2.)
256 A.D. 802·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1939·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of William J. Dawley, Petitioner, Respondent, for an Order Pursuant to Section 475 of the Judiciary Law to Fix an Attorney’s Lien. Benjamin F. Haas, Appellant, v. Albert Goldstein and Nat Rosenthal, Defendants. (Action No. 1.) Benjamin F. Haas, Appellant, v. Albert Goldstein, Defendant. (Action No. 2.)
[MAJORITY]
Order unanimously affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.