Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Edward D. Peters, Respondent, v. Robert B. Adam et al., Constituting the Civil Service Commission of the City of Buffalo, Appellants, 1908 — 190 N.Y. 567 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Edward D. Peters, Respondent, v. Robert B. Adam et al., Constituting the Civil Service Commission of the City of Buffalo, Appellants
190 N.Y. 567·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. Edward D. Peters, Respondent, v. Robert B. Adam et al., Constituting the Civil Service Commission of the City of Buffalo, Appellants.
People ex rel. Peters v. Adam, 122 App. Div. 898, affirmed.
(Argued January 7, 1908;
decided January 21, 1908.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered November 27, 1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion for a peremptory writ of mandamus to compel defendants to certify to the payrolls of the relator.
Samuel F. Morcm and Louis F. Desbecl&er for appellants,
Simon Fleischma/nn for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Cüllbn, Ch. J., Gray', Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.