Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hartsfield v. Sloan, U. S. District Judge, 1958 — 357 U.S. 916 · caselaw · US
General
Hartsfield v. Sloan, U. S. District Judge
357 U.S. 916·Supreme Court of the United States·1958
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Brennan think that a rule to show cause should issue.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 683,
Misc.
Hartsfield v. Sloan, U. S. District Judge.
[MAJORITY]
Motion of United States Conference of Mayors for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, granted. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus denied.
The Chief Justice, Mr. Justice Black, Mr. Justice Douglas, and Mr. Justice Brennan think that a rule to show cause should issue.
Morris B. Abram for petitioner. Eugene Cook, Attorney General, Freeman Lev-erett, Robert H. Hall, Assistant Attorneys General, and B. D. Murphy for the Secretary of State of Georgia, and Charles J. Bloch for Bell, Chairman, Georgia State Democratic Executive Committee, et al., filed briefs in opposition to the motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus. Wallace M. Cohen filed a brief for the United States Conference of Mayors, as amicus curiae, urging that the motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus be granted.