Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William S. Lovell, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Henry Hentz & Company et al., 1913 — 231 U.S. 738 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
William S. Lovell, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Henry Hentz & Company et al.
231 U.S. 738·Supreme Court of the United States·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 221.
William S. Lovell, as Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. Henry Hentz & Company et al.
In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.
Motion to dismiss or affirm submitted October 27, 1913.
Decided November 3, 1913.
Mr. Walker Percy and Mr. H. Generes Dufour for the plaintiff in error. Mr. Phelan Beale for the defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Lovell v. Newman, 227 U. S. 412.