General
Samuel H. Mildenberg et al., Appellants, v. Darwin R. James et al., Respondents
175 N.Y. 494·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Samuel H. Mildenberg et al., Appellants, v. Darwin R. James et al., Respondents.
Mildenberg v. James, 63 App. Div. 617, affirmed.
(Argued May 19, 1908;
decided June 2, 1903.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 13, 1901, affirming a judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
E. H. Benn for appellants.
Arthur J. Baldwin for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Oh. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Martin, Cullen and Werner, JJ.