General
Florence Nunnally, Respondent, v. New Yorker Staats-Zeitung, Appellant
186 N.Y. 532·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Florence Nunnally, Respondent, v. New Yorker StaatsZeitung, Appellant.
Nunnally v. New Torlcer Staats-Zeitung, 111 App. Div. 482, affirmed.
(Argued October 1. 1906;
decided October 16, 1906.)
Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered March 9, 19Ó6, which affirmed an interlocutory judgment of Special Term overruling a demurrer to the complaint in an action for libel.
The following question was certified: “ Does the complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action 1 ”
William J. Amend, John K. Donnelly and Alfred J. Amend for appellant.
George H. D. Foster for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
• Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Patterson, J., below. Question certified answered in the affirmative.
Concur: Cullen," Ch. J., Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Yann, Werner, Willard Bartlett and Chase, JJ.