General
Max Schlossberg Co. v. United States
28 Cust. Ct. 449·United States Customs Court·1952
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the Second Division,
April 10, 1952
No. 56541.
protest 151520-K (Detroit).
Max Schlossberg Co. v. United States,
[MAJORITY — Lawrence, J.]
Opinion by
Lawrence, J.
It was stipulated that the merchandise in controversy at the time of entry consisted of articles of which metal was the component material of chief value and were not ores or concentrates or crude metal; that said articles were imported to be used in remanufacture by melting; and that since entry, said articles were melted and remanufactured by melting. An examination of the papers disclosed that affidavits have been filed in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to Public Law 869, supra. Upon the record presented, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, supra, and is properly entitled to free entry.