General
ROGERS BROTHERS COMPANY et al., Respondents, v. F. W. HOLSAPPLE et al., Appellants
43 Cal. App. 801·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1919·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Civ. No. 3001.
First Appellate District, Division One.
September 2, 1919.]
ROGERS BROTHERS COMPANY et al., Respondents, v. F. W. HOLSAPPLE et al., Appellants.
Street Law—Action to Foreclose Lien—Pleading—Evidence. Judgment affirmed on the authority of Sogers Brothers Co. et al. v. Beck et al., ante, p. 110, [181 Pac. 515].
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Imperial County. W. H. Thomas, Judge Presiding. Affirmed.
The facts are the same as those stated in Rogers Brothers Co. et al. v. Beck et al., ante, p. 110, [184 Pac. 515].
James E. O’Keefe and C. H. Van Winkle for Appellants.
Crouch & Crouch for Respondents.
[MAJORITY — THE COURT.]
THE COURT.
On the authority of Rogers Brothers Co. et al. v. Beck et al., ante, p. 110, [184 Pac. 515], the judgment is affirmed.