Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Lucas et al. v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado et al., 1964 — 376 U.S. 941 · caselaw · US
General
Lucas et al. v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado et al.
376 U.S. 941·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 508.
Lucas et al. v. Forty-Fourth General Assembly of Colorado et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. (Probable jurisdiction noted, 375 U. S. 938.) The motion of the Solicitor General, on behalf of the United States, for leave to participate in the oral argument, as amicus curiae, is granted and thirty minutes are allotted for that purpose. Counsel for the appellees are allotted an additional thirty minutes for oral argument.