General
GLORIEUX v. STEELE
255 F. 990·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1919
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GLORIEUX v. STEELE.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
January 15, 1919.)
No. 129.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Action by Ray Steele against Jules Glorieux. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
Affirmed.
H. A. Talbot, of New York City (Moses Feltenstein, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.
Edward Maxson, of New York City (James G. Martin, of Norfolk, Va., of counsel), for defendant in error.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MANTON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment affirmed.