General

IN RE EDEN F. ET AL.

251 Conn. 924·Connecticut Supreme Court·1999·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

IN RE EDEN F. ET AL. (SC 15965) [MAJORITY] The motion by the respondent mother, Ann F., for reargument en banc of this court’s decision in In re Eden F., 250 Conn. 674, 741 A.2d 843 (1999), is denied. [DISSENT — BERDON, J.,] BERDON, J., dissenting. I dissent from the denial of the respondent mother’s motion for reargument en banc for the reasons stated in my dissent to In re Eden F., 250 Conn. 674, 720B, 741 A.2d 843 (1999). Roger E. Bunker, in support of the motion. David T. Stone, in opposition. Susan T. Pearlman, assistant attorney general, in opposition. Decided December 21, 1999 [DISSENT — MCDONALD, J.,] MCDONALD, J., dissenting. I concur in the reasoning and conclusions of Justice Berdon’s dissent. In re Eden F., 250 Conn. 674, 720B, 741 A.2d 843 (1999).