Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
POWER SPECIALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CONNECTICUT LIGHT & POWER COMPANY and B. F. Sturtevant Company, Defendants-Appellants, 1929 — 31 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
General
POWER SPECIALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CONNECTICUT LIGHT & POWER COMPANY and B. F. Sturtevant Company, Defendants-Appellants
31 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1929
Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
POWER SPECIALTY COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CONNECTICUT LIGHT & POWER COMPANY and B. F. Sturtevant Company, Defendants-Appellants.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
April 1, 1929.
No. 242.
- Charles Neave, of New York City, and Alfred H. Hildreth and Melvin R. Jenney, both of Boston, Mass., for appellants.
William G. McKnight, of New York City, for appellee.
Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Thomas, J., in 27 F.(2d) 928. '