Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The State of Minnesota ex rel. Jalmer M. Larsen, Plaintiff in Error, v. Hugh R. Scott, as Auditor of the County of Hennepin, 1910 — 219 U.S. 582 · caselaw · US
General
The State of Minnesota ex rel. Jalmer M. Larsen, Plaintiff in Error, v. Hugh R. Scott, as Auditor of the County of Hennepin
219 U.S. 582·Supreme Court of the United States·1910
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 586.
The State of Minnesota ex rel. Jalmer M. Larsen, Plaintiff in Error, v. Hugh R. Scott, as Auditor of the County of Hennepin.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota.
Motion to dismiss submitted December 12, 1910.
Decided December 19, 1910.
Mr. Milton D. Purdy, for defendant in error, in support of the-motion.
Mr. Carl Strover, for plaintiff in error, in opposition thereto.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed with costs.