General

In the Matter of Edward Blatt, an Attorney, Respondent

257 A.D. 278·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1939·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of Edward Blatt, an Attorney, Respondent. First Department, June 16, 1939. Einar Chrystie, for the petitioner. Edward Blatt, respondent in person. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. On May 2, 1939, the respondent was convicted in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York of a violation of section 88 of title 18 of the United States Code (Crim. Code, § 37). Said crime is a felony. Pursuant to subdivision 3 of section 88 and section 477 of the Judiciary Law, the respondent, therefore, should be disbarred. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Townley, Glennon and Dore, JJ., concur. Respondent disbarred.