Contracts · MBE-tested
John Kohilakis et al., Respondents, v. Thomas J. Harwood et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Islip, et al., Appellants
15 A.D.2d 795·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1962·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John Kohilakis et al., Respondents, v. Thomas J. Harwood et al., Constituting the Town Board of the Town of Islip, et al., Appellants.
[MAJORITY]
In our opinion, upon the record presented, no real issue survives for trial. It was solely within the competence of the Town Board to determine the comprehensiveness and the propriety of the contracts let for the incinerator plant, provided only that the actual final aggregate amount of such contracts does not exceed the limits fixed by the Town Board resolution and the public referendum authorizing the improvement. The undisputed facts here show that the actual final aggregate amount of the contracts let and to be let will be within such limits. Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Hill, Babin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.