Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Robert D. Kinney, Plaintiff in Error, v. Plymouth Rock Squab Company et al., 1916 — 241 U.S. 653 · caselaw · US
General
Robert D. Kinney, Plaintiff in Error, v. Plymouth Rock Squab Company et al.
241 U.S. 653·Supreme Court of the United States·1916
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 344.
Robert D. Kinney, Plaintiff in Error, v. Plymouth Rock Squab Company et al.
In error to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the First Circuit.
Argued by the plaintiff in error May 1, 1916.
Decided May 22, 1916.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Bagley v. General Fire Extinguisher Co., 212 U. S. 477; Weir v. Rountree, 216 U. S. 607; St. Anthony Church v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co., 237 U. S. 575. (2) Provident Savings Society v. Ford, 114 U. S. 635, 641-642; Metcalf v. Watertown, 128 U. S. 586, 588; Pope v. Louisville, New Albany &c. Ry., 173 U. S. 573, 580-581. See United States ex rel. Kinney v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 222 U. S. 283; Kinney v. Plymouth Rock Squab Co., 236 U. S. 43.
Mr. Robert D. Kinney pro se. No appearance for the defendants in error.