Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Nixon v. Florida, 1966 — 385 U.S. 853 · caselaw · US
General
Nixon v. Florida
385 U.S. 853·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 28,
Misc.
Nixon v. Florida.
Marco Loffredo and Phillip A. Hubbart for petitioner.
Earl Faircloth, Attorney General of Florida, and James T. Carlisle, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Dist. Ct. App. Fla., 3d Dist. Certiorari denied.