General
Edward Hitchcock, Respondent, v. The City of Syracuse, Appellant
167 N.Y. 596·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edward Hitchcock, Respondent, v. The City of Syracuse, Appellant.
(Argued April 25, 1901;
decided June 4, 1901.)
Hitchcock v. City of Syracuse, 41 App. Div. 623, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the-Supreme - Court in the fourth, judicial department, entered June 8, 1899, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
James S. Thorn and M. Z. Haven for appellant.
Canfield I. Reymon and George H. Sears for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Yann, Landon and Cullen, JJ. Not sitting: Martin, J.