General
Illinois Central Railroad Co. et al. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. et al.; Calumet Harbor Terminals, Inc., et al. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. et al.; and United States et al. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. et al.
382 U.S. 913·Supreme Court of the United States·1965
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 445.
No. 484.
No. 543.
Illinois Central Railroad Co. et al. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. et al.; Calumet Harbor Terminals, Inc., et al. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. et al.; and United States et al. v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. et al.
William J. O’Brien, Jr., Robert Mitten, Robert H. Bierma, Edmund A. Schroer and John C. Lawyer for appellants in No. 445. Charles B. Myers for appellants in No. 484.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Turner, Lionel Kestenbaum, Jerry Z. Pruzansky, Robert W. Ginnane and Robert S. Burk for the United States et al. in No. 543.
John L. Bordes and Martin L. Cassell for Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. et al., appel-lees in all cases.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from D. C. N. D. Ohio. Probable jurisdiction noted. Cases consolidated and a total of two hours allotted for oral argument.
Reported below: 241 F. Supp. 974.