Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Edmund C. Converse, Respondent, v. Severyn B. Sharpe et al., as Receivers of the American Casualty Insurance and Security Company, Appellants, Impleaded with Others, 1899 — 160 N.Y. 673 · caselaw · US
Securities
Edmund C. Converse, Respondent, v. Severyn B. Sharpe et al., as Receivers of the American Casualty Insurance and Security Company, Appellants, Impleaded with Others
160 N.Y. 673·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Edmund C. Converse, Respondent, v. Severyn B. Sharpe et al., as Receivers of the American Casualty Insurance and Security Company, Appellants, Impleaded with Others.
(Submitted October 2, 1899;
decided October 10, 1899.)
Reported below, 37 App. Div. 399.
Motion to place upon present calendar an appeal from a final judgment entered May 18, 1899, upon an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, affirming an interlocutory judgment entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
The motion was made upon the ground that the ends of' justice entitle the appeal to a preference.
Eugene Lamb Richards, Jr., and William H. Gibson for motion.
[MAJORITY]
No one opposed.
Motion denied, without costs.