Contracts · MBE-tested
Cota v. California
364 U.S. 921·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion certiorari should be granted. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. Petitioner pro se.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 505.
Cota v. California.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion certiorari should be granted. The Chief Justice took no part in the consideration or decision of this application. Petitioner pro se.
Roger Arnebergh and Philip E. Grey for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Appellate Department, Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County. Certiorari denied.