Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Fruehauf et al., 1960 — 364 U.S. 810 · caselaw · US
General
United States v. Fruehauf et al.
364 U.S. 810·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 91.
United States v. Fruehauf et al.
Probable jurisdiction noted. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey, Beatrice Rosenberg and Eugene L. Grimm for the United States. Louis Nizer, Cyrus R. Vance, Mortimer A. Sullivan, Albert C. Bickford, Charles Seligson, Albert I. Schmalholz, Melvin Lloyd Robbins, Charles S. Burdell and Donald McL. Davidson for appellees.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.