General
Leacock & Co., Inc. v. United States
7 Cust. Ct. 351·United States Customs Court·1941
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Leacock & Co., Inc. v. United States
No. 5325.
Invoice dated Chefoo, China, January 30, 1940.
Certified February 6, 1940.
Entered at New York March 27, 1940.
Entry Nos. 60105/1, 60426/1, 60685/1, 60925/1.
(Decided June 20, 1941)
Plaintiff not represented by counsel.
Charles D. Lawrence, Acting Assistant Attorney General (Daniel I. Ausler, special attorney), for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Tilson, Judge:]
Tilson, Judge:
Accepting the stipulation entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties upon which this appeal has been submitted for decision as a statement of fact, I find and hold the proper dutiable export values of the merchandise covered by entries 60105/1, 60426/1, 60685/1 and 60925/1 to be the per se unit invoice values of material and labor, plus 10 per centum, plus labor for packing, and/or steel strapping as invoiced, plus cartons at 17 cents each. As to any and all other merchandise covered by this appeal I find and hold the proper dutiable export value to be the value found by the appraiser. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.