Criminal Law · MBE-tested
In the Matter of the Application of JOHN P. TUREK for a Writ of Habeas Corpus
38 Cal. App. 784·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1918·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Crim. No. 819.
First Appellate District.
October 16, 1918.]
In the Matter of the Application of JOHN P. TUREK for a Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Criminal Law—Void Sentence—Indeterminate Sentence Law—Re-sentence.—Prisoner discharged on authority of In the Matter of Ex parte Bouphard, ante, p. 441.
APPLICATION for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
Petitioner in pro. per.
U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and John H. Riordan, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — THE COURT.]
THE COURT.
This is an application for a writ of habeas corpus. The facts are in all material respects the same and the principles of law involved are the same as in Ex parte Bouchard, ante, p. 441, [176 Pac. 692]. On the authority of that case the petitioner should be discharged. It is so ordered.