Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. New York Building-Loan Banking Company, Defendant. In the Matter of the Accounting of Charles M. Preston as Receiver. George Ehret et al., Appellants; Charles M. Preston, as Receiver, et al., Respondents, 1907 — 189 N.Y. 547 · caselaw · US
Corporations
The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. New York Building-Loan Banking Company, Defendant. In the Matter of the Accounting of Charles M. Preston as Receiver. George Ehret et al., Appellants; Charles M. Preston, as Receiver, et al., Respondents
189 N.Y. 547·New York Court of Appeals·1907·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. New York Building-Loan Banking Company, Defendant. In the Matter of the Accounting of Charles M. Preston as Receiver. George Ehret et al., Appellants; Charles M. Preston, as Receiver, et al., Respondents.
People v. N. 7. Building-Loan Banicing Company, 119 App. Div. 830, affirmed.
(Argued October 1, 1907;
decided October 15, 1907.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered June 7, 1907, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee in a special proceeding for the taking and stating of the accounts of the receiver of an insolvent corporation.
Frederick JB. Woodruff, Frederic W. Hinrichs and Charles C. Cormany for appellants.
Howard Chúpjy and Charles W. Dayton, Jr., for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, C. J., O’Brien, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Hiscook and Chase, JJ.