Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Orla RUBSAMEN, Individually, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CARL H. SCHULTZ, a Corporation, . Defendant; Orla Rubsamen, Individually, etc., Appellant, 1926 — 12 F.2d 1018 · caselaw · US
Corporations
Orla RUBSAMEN, Individually, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CARL H. SCHULTZ, a Corporation, . Defendant; Orla Rubsamen, Individually, etc., Appellant
12 F.2d 1018·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Orla RUBSAMEN, Individually, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CARL H. SCHULTZ, a Corporation, . Defendant; Orla Rubsamen, Individually, etc., Appellant.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
June 1, 1926.)
No. 388.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Appeal from an order of sale entered in a cause in equity in the District Cburt for the Southern District of New York.
Ward V. Tobert (David Steekler, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.
Michael M. Helfgott, of New York City, for intervener appellee.
Joseph D. Fackenthal, of New York City, for purchaser at sale.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH and HAND, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Ordered that, except as to the proceeds of the sales of real estate situated without the Southern district of New York, the decree be affirmed. The method of modifying the decree in accordance with this direction is left to the lower court. No costs of this court are allowed.