Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Pemberton's Lessee v. Hicks, 1799 — 4 U.S. 145 · caselaw · US
Property · MBE-tested
Pemberton's Lessee v. Hicks
4 U.S. 1454 Dall. 145·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1799·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Pemberton’s Lessee v. Hicks.
Forfeiture.
A tenant by the curtesy initiate, has not an estate forfeitable upon his attainder for treason.
[MAJORITY]
This cause (which was argued in December term 1798, 3 Dall. 479) was kept under advisement, until the 23d of December 1799, when Shippen, Chief Justice, and Yeates, Justice, were of opinion with the plaintiff, and Smith, Justice, was of opinion with the defendant.
Judgment for the plaintiff.
McKean, C. J., presided at the argument of the cause; but being elected governor of the commonwealth, in October 1799, he took no part in the decision. He informed the reporter, however, that his opinion was decidedly in favor of the defendant.