General

Francis P. O'Neill v. George G. Priest

154 Colo. 35387 P.2d 727·Colorado Supreme Court·1963·CO

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

No. 20,780. Francis P. O’Neill v. George G. Priest. (387 P. [2d] 727) Decided December 23, 1963. Miss Virginia Malloy, for plaintiff in error. Mr. Duke W. Dunbar, Attorney General, Mr. Frank E. Hickey, Deputy, for defendant in error. En Banc. [MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Frantz] Mr. Chief Justice Frantz delivered the opinion of the Court. The Attorney General has confessed error in this case, based upon our recent opinion in the case of The District Attorney in and for the County of Alamosa v. The District Court in and for the County of Alamosa, 150 Colo. 136, 371 P. (2d) 271. We agree with the Attorney General that the cited case is determinative of the question involved in this writ of error and that the principle therein enunciated requires a reversal of this case. The judgment is reversed.