Criminal Law · MBE-tested

Robert LEFEVER v. STATE of Arkansas

359 Ark. 251195 S.W.3d 928·Arkansas Supreme Court·2004·AR

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Robert LEFEVER v. STATE of Arkansas CR 04-1028 195 S.W.3d 928 Supreme Court of Arkansas Opinion delivered October 21, 2004 Cindy M. Baker, for appellant. No response. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. Robert Lefever, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. His attorney, Cindy M. Baker, admits in her motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on her part. We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam). The motion is, therefore, granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.