Administrative
Aloha Factors and American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States, protests 59/34562, etc. (Honolulu); Hilo Rice Mill Co., Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States, protests 60/19711, etc. (Honolulu); Taiyo Trading Company and American Customs Brokg. Co. et al. v. United States, protests 63/3460, etc. (Honolulu)
57 Cust. Ct. 793·United States Customs Court·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Beeore the Third Division,
June 30, 1966
No. P66/149. —
No. P66/150. —
No. P66/151. —
Aloha Factors and American Customs Brokerage Co. v. United States, protests 59/34562, etc. (Honolulu). Hilo Rice Mill Co., Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. et al. v. United States, protests 60/19711, etc. (Honolulu). Taiyo Trading Company and American Customs Brokg. Co. et al. v. United States, protests 63/3460, etc. (Honolulu).
[MAJORITY — Donlon, J.]
Donlon, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of Iso peanuts, peanut crackers, and Japanese rice crackers similar in all material respects to those the subject of Hilo Rice Mill Co., Ltd., American Customs Brokerage Company et al. v. United States (52 CCPA 106, C.A.D. 866), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.