Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of Morris BLEECKER et al. Bankrupts. Samuel SHINKMAN and Milton M. Berkowitz, Petitioners, 1926 — 14 F.2d 1019 · caselaw · US
Bankruptcy
In the Matter of Morris BLEECKER et al. Bankrupts. Samuel SHINKMAN and Milton M. Berkowitz, Petitioners
14 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1926
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Morris BLEECKER et al. Bankrupts. Samuel SHINKMAN and Milton M. Berkowitz, Petitioners.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
October 14, 1926.)
No. 7.
Petition to Revise Order of the District Court of the United States for. the Southern District of New York.
Samuel Rose, of New York City (David Leavenworth, of New York City, of counsel), for petitioners.
Eugene L. Bondy and Bondy & Sehloss, all of New York City, for respondent.
Before MANTON, HAND, and MACK, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Order (14 F.[2d] 1018) affirmed in open court.