General
Howard SUTHERLAND, as Alien Property Custodian, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellees. Hamburg Assurance Company, Appellant
43 F.2d 972·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Howard SUTHERLAND, as Alien Property Custodian, Appellant, v. INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK et al., Appellees. Hamburg Assurance Company, Appellant.
No. 363.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
July 28, 1930.
Charles J. Schuck, of Wheeling, W. Va., • for appellant Alien Property Custodian.
Nathan Ottinger, of New York City, for appellant Hamburg Assur. Co.
Rumsey & Morgan, of New York City (Emory R. Buckner and Root, Clark, Buckner & Ballantine, all of New York City, and Steptoe & Johnson, of Clarksburg, W. Va., of counsel), for appellees. .
Before MANTON, L. HAND, and • SWAN, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This ease is in all respects like Sutherland v. International Insurance Company, 43 F. (2d) 969, decided along with it. The same disposition should be made of it for the reasons given therein.
Deeree reversed, and cause remanded for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion in Sutherland v. International Insurance Company, 43 F.(2d) 969.