Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY, et al., petitioners, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY; and Intuitive Surgical, Inc., et al., petitioners, v. Michigan Department of Treasury., 2017 — 137 S. Ct. 2157 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY, et al., petitioners, v. MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY; and Intuitive Surgical, Inc., et al., petitioners, v. Michigan Department of Treasury.
137 S. Ct. 2157198 L. Ed. 2d 245·Supreme Court of the United States·2017
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SONOCO PRODUCTS COMPANY, et al., petitioners,
v.
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY; and Intuitive Surgical, Inc., et al., petitioners,
v.
Michigan Department of Treasury.
No. 16-687.
Supreme Court of the United States
May 22, 2017.
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Michigan denied.
[MAJORITY — Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.]
Justice ALITO took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.