Criminal Law · MBE-tested
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Walter Reed, Appellant
254 A.D.2d 691678 N.Y.S.2d 553·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1998·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Walter Reed, Appellant.
[678 NYS2d 553]
[MAJORITY]
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contentions concerning Supreme Court’s Sandoval ruling are not preserved for our review (see, People v McAllister, 245 AD2d 184, lv denied 91 NY2d 894; People v Charlton, 239 AD2d 104, lv denied 90 NY2d 903; People v Venero, 211 AD2d 566, lv denied 86 NY2d 785), and we decline to exercise our power to review them as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice (see, CPL 470.15 [6] [a]). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J. — Criminal Sale Controlled Substance, 3rd Degree.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Wisner, Balio and Fallon, JJ.