General
Doe et al. v. Commonwealth's Attorney for the City of Richmond et al.
425 U.S. 901·Supreme Court of the United States·1976
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Marshall, and Mr. Justice Stevens would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 75-896.
Doe et al. v. Commonwealth’s Attorney for the City of Richmond et al.
[MAJORITY]
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. E. D. Ya.
Mr. Justice Brennan, Mr. Justice Marshall, and Mr. Justice Stevens would note probable jurisdiction and set case for oral argument.