General
JOHN J. BRADY, Respondent, v. ROBERT C. PAGE et al., Appellants
66 Cal. 232·Supreme Court of California·1884·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 8,368.
Department One
December 15, 1884.
JOHN J. BRADY, Respondent, v. ROBERT C. PAGE et al., Appellants.
Judgment Bold—Appointment op Guardian ad Litem.—An order appointing a guardian ad litem for minor defendants constitutes no part of a judgment roll.
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco.
Action to foreclose a street assessment lien.
The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
Jos. M. Nougues, for Appellants.
C. H. Parker, for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — The Court]
The Court
The order of December 21, 1877, purporting to appoint a guardian ad litem for the minor defendant, constitutes no part of the judgment roll. (Emeric v. Alvarado, 64 Cal. 529.) As the judgment roll discloses no error, and the appeal is from the judgment on the roll alone, the judgment is affirmed.