Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Petition of Harrison C. Pales, Respondent, to be Relieved from his Purchase on the Foreclosure Sale in Action of Teunis Schenck Remsen, Appellant, v. Sarah A. Storm et al., 1898 — 157 N.Y. 705 · caselaw · US
General
In the Matter of the Petition of Harrison C. Pales, Respondent, to be Relieved from his Purchase on the Foreclosure Sale in Action of Teunis Schenck Remsen, Appellant, v. Sarah A. Storm et al.
157 N.Y. 705·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Petition of Harrison C. Pales, Respondent, to be Relieved from his Purchase on the Foreclosure Sale in Action of Teunis Schenck Remsen, Appellant, v. Sarah A. Storm et al.
Mutter of Fates, 33 App. Div. 611, affirmed.
(Argued November 21, 1898;
decided December 6, 1898.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered October 25, 1898, affirming an order of Special Term relieving the petitioner from his purchase at a foreclosure sale.
Sector M. Sitchings for appellant.
J. Alexander Koones for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Orders affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Gray, J., absent.