Corporations
In re The TIZ CORPORATION, d/b/a the Spotted Stag, Debtor. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TIZ CORPORATION, d/b/a the Spotted Stag, Defendant-Appellee
766 F.2d 1536·United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·1985
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, KRAV-ITCH and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re The TIZ CORPORATION, d/b/a the Spotted Stag, Debtor. DIVISION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND TOBACCO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TIZ CORPORATION, d/b/a the Spotted Stag, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 84-3579
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
July 29, 1985.
Thomas L. Barnhart, Dept, of Business' Regulation, Tallahassee, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.
Patti W. Massari, Tampa, Fla., Thomas C. Little, Clearwater, Fla., for defendant-appellee.
Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, KRAV-ITCH and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
PER CURIAM:
The appeal of the bankruptcy court’s order authorizing the sale of a liquor license is moot because no stay was ever granted. See e.g., In re Sewanee Land, Coal and Cattle, Inc., 735 F.2d 1294 (11th Cir.1984); American Grain Association v. Lee-Vac, Ltd, 630 F.2d 245 (5th Cir.1980). We find nothing in the plain language of the subsection, or of the legislative history, or the caselaw, that creates an exception for appeals based upon alleged violations of state law.
The appeal is DISMISSED.