General
HEYMANN v. HARNESBERGER
226 F. 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1915
Before PARDEE and WALKER, Circuit Judges, and FOSTER, District Judge.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HEYMANN v. HARNESBERGER.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
October 25, 1915.)
No. 2801.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the1 Southern District of Georgia; Emory Speer, Judge.
Samuel II. Myers, of Augusta, Ga., and Arthur H. Codington, of Macon, Ga., for appellant. William H. Fleming, of Augusta, Ga., for appellee.
Before PARDEE and WALKER, Circuit Judges, and FOSTER, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On a careful examination of this record, we conclude that there were no such prejudicial errors in the rulings made- in the District Court as would warrant a reversal. The decree appealed from is affirmed.