General
Maritza P., as Mother and Guardian Ad Litem of Ismael Daniel M., an Infant, et al., Respondents, v. Devereux Foundation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant
149 A.D.3d 55450 N.Y.S.3d 268·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2017·NY
Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Maritza P., as Mother and Guardian Ad Litem of Ismael Daniel M., an Infant, et al., Respondents, v Devereux Foundation et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant.
[50 NYS3d 268]
[MAJORITY]
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Geoffrey D. Wright, J.), entered on or about December 17, 2015, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants-appellants’ (defendants) motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Defendants having satisfied their initial burden on summary judgment, the burden shifted to plaintiffs to raise a triable issue of fact (see CPLR 3212 [b]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). In satisfaction of their burden, plaintiffs offered competent proof in the form of deposition testimony, medical records and police records, which raised triable issues (see generally N.X. v Cabrini Med. Ctr., 97 NY2d 247 [2002]; Kelly G. v Board of Educ. of City of Yonkers, 99 AD3d 756 [2d Dept 2012]).
Concur — Friedman, J.P., Renwick, Moskowitz, Feinman and Kapnick, JJ.