Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
PIEDMONT AND NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, Southern Railway Company, et al., Appellees, 1932 — 59 F.2d 1071 · caselaw · US
General
PIEDMONT AND NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, Southern Railway Company, et al., Appellees
59 F.2d 1071·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
PIEDMONT AND NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Appellant, v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, Southern Railway Company, et al., Appellees.
No. 3255.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
March 14, 1932.
H. J. Haynsworth, of Greenville, S. C., and R. S. Hutchison and W. S. O’B. Robinson, Jr., both of Charlotte, N. C., for appellant.
Daniel W. Knowlton, Nelson Thomas, c/o Interstate Commerce Commission, Sidney S. Alderman, and L. E. Jeffries, c/o Southern Ry. Co., all of Washington, D. C., F. B. Grier and Carl H. Davis, both of Wilmington, N. C., William C. Burger, of Louisville, Ky., and James J. McLaughlin, of Erwin, Tenn., for appellees.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Before ease argued in this court, appellant applied to the Supreme Court of the United States for a writ of certiorari, which writ was granted by that court.