Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John B. Ayers, Respondent, v. The Western Railroad Corporation, Appellant, 1872 — 49 N.Y. 660 · caselaw · US
Corporations
John B. Ayers, Respondent, v. The Western Railroad Corporation, Appellant
49 N.Y. 660·New York Court of Appeals·1872·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John B. Ayers, Respondent, v. The Western Railroad Corporation, Appellant.
(Argued April 9, 1872;
decided April 16, 1872.)
Costs on appeal in an action at law are in the discretion of the court only when the judgment is reversed in part and affirmed in part, or where a new trial is granted. The addition to a -judgment in this court of the words “ with costs,” or “ without costs,” cannot affect the right of the prevailing party in such action.
Motion to correct remittitur by adding the words “ with costs.” The court decide as above, but add: “ As we think that it (appellant) has the right to costs, we grant the motion.”
John M. Reynolds for the appellant.
Geo. Bliss, Jr., for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted. Per Curiam opinion.-
All concur.