Contracts · MBE-tested
In re Ronald Wayne WALKER, Sr; Lisa Ann Walker; Janet M. Nesse, Debtors, v. Elizabeth Anne Reeves, Counsel for Debtors, Debtor-Appellant, v. United States Trustee, Trustee-Appellee
489 F. App'x 714·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·2012
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In re Ronald Wayne WALKER, Sr; Lisa Ann Walker; Janet M. Nesse, Debtors, v. Elizabeth Anne Reeves, Counsel for Debtors, Debtor-Appellant, v. United States Trustee, Trustee-Appellee.
No. 12-1900.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 20, 2012.
Decided: Nov. 26, 2012.
Elizabeth Anne Reeves, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Joseph Schneider, Jr., United States Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.; Gerard Richard Vetter, Office of the United States Trustee, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM:]
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Elizabeth Anne Reeves appeals the district court’s orders: (1) dismissing her appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order for failure to comply with Bankr.R. 8009; and (2) denying her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Reeves v. United States Trustee, Nos. 8:12-cv-00918-AW; 11-19737; 11-20840; 11-26340; 12-11149 (D. Md. June 6, 2012; June 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.